Join the Academy

No Gravatar

I had another meeting with the Format crew last night and got all excited about programming the Academy. I’m still looking for panelists and performers to get involved, so here’s the submission form, and there is a little more information at this Facebook event. (I know I wrote about pulling away from Facebook, but I’ve changed my mind about worse things.) Feel free to invite your friends to the event, and put 22 November in your diary as the deadline.

If you have no idea what I’m talking about, these reliable sources have more to say about the Festival and it’s blessed Academy. Also, check out the 2010 Festival program – flick the flash little curtain things to the left until you get to Day Fifteen, or see the Academy program here at Lisa Dempster’s blog, Unwakeable. Lisa programmed the Academy this year – a gig she took on just before getting the Directorship of Emerging Writers’ Festival in Melbourne. Big shoes!

Optimism is Compulsory

No Gravatar

This article on Dave Eggers’ optimism about youth literacy and print books (via @Mean_land) made me think of the title of his unfinished Salon.com serial, The Unforbidden is Compulsory, or, Optimism: for Eggers, it would seem, optimism about print books is compulsory, and should not be forbidden.

Elsewhere (almost everywhere else), it seems the trend is in the chatter: it’s trendy to be pessimistic about print books, regardless of whether there is actually a declining trend in print-book readership, because worrying about the decline of print books seems to illustrate your affinity with digitial technology and the democritising power of the internet.

But I think it’s true that the concern is misguided:

Adults might be projecting from their own behavior when they worry that kids will forsake reading in favor of Twitter, Eggers said, as some adults in the audience nodded in apparent self-recognition. “We’re blaming the kids, but we’re the ones who can’t stop checking our e-mail and adding the latest Google apps.”

So stop worrying about it, stop reading this blog, and go sit in the park with a book, it’s spring time!

A World Without Agency

No Gravatar

I was doing a bit of internet stalking the other day and came across this article by Rjurik Davidson about creative writing courses and so forth. It’s an interesting read, but there was one line in particular that hit out at me from a guy he interviewed (Errol).

[I]n the 1970s, there was a much smaller pool of authors … fewer publishers [and] no literary agents. We were more inclined to take on things that were perhaps a bit rough around the edges in the hope that we could work with the author and polish them up … We used to do more work in those days. All sorts of things have happened since then. Literary agents have come along …

There it is. That ellipses represented to me not a edited quote (which it was) but a backward gaze into the carefree days before agents or agencies, and my head started to explode from wondering about what the industry would look like without formal representation for authors. In this one paragraph I could see a literary utopia blossoming like vinegar and baking soda in a glass – a place/time where writers and editors worked on manuscripts together in coffee shops, their heads bent to the paper and their noses nearly touching, and the editor would whisper a word of advice and the writer would leap up and shout in delight and the book would be a bestseller and everyone had leather bound notebooks and no-one wrote about vampires.

Obviously this is far from any reality. I know that agents play an integral part in the industry game – making sure that authors get enough money for their art. But facing a time when the author-publisher relationship might be changing, I started to consider what this could mean for agents. Are they likely to be more important now in bartering distribution and rights deals for digital editions? Or will the author just take their Adobe Acrobat and manuscript and go straight to a distributor themselves?

More than this, I began to question the fundamental aspects of being an agent. It seems to me that literary agents are another form of middle-management – external to the house but somehow so entwined in all the major publishing deals that they can’t be bypassed. Even though it’s a job an editor could perform if they had the inclination. Sourcing new talent and reading raw manuscripts – didn’t this once fall under the remit of editor/editorial assistant? It sounds like more fun than dealing with an author who has a premature ego the size of a small galaxy due to the fact an agent has decided to pitch their novel to Penguin. And is this even what agents really do? There are now books out on how to best go about getting an agent, as the agents themselves start putting up filters before they will touch a manuscript.

I believe publishing houses should do more in-house siphoning. Not to put agents out of work, but to keep their hands in the author pool, feeling out the grooves and flows, rather than only dipping their toes in the warm shallows. With socks on.

Crowd-sourced Programming

No Gravatar

Crowdsourcing!


In the DIY spirit of Format and the one-day literary festival I’m programming for them, I’m posting prospective blurb titles for the events I’m thinking of running on the day, and I want you to write the blurb you think I should run with it. Hopefully some panel ideas will come out of it, and you’ll be keen to host the discussion. I’m also running this as a meme, and have tagged: Connor Tomas O’Brien (not to be confused with the drastically oceanic Connor Tomas), George Dunford, Estelle Tang, Elena Gomez and Lisa Dempster, who directed the Academy this year and is now running Emerging Writers’ Festival.

The Blurb Titles

Activism Smells

Copy Left, Right, Left, Right, What?

How to Sell Out Without Losing Your Cred

Miles, Miles, Who the Fuck is Miles?

The Future of Adulthood

Honk if You’re the Publishing Industry

Why Isn’t Writing More Like, Say, Mining?

Where Can We Go From Here?

I Write, Therefore I am a …

Fulture-cunding Vultures

The Forum Frenzy

No Gravatar

I do hate a lot of things (Disney, marketing, Andrew Wiley etc) but I want to put it out there that this isn’t all I’m about. I got really excited when Tim Hely Hutchinson (CEO of Hachette UK) decided to go with the agency pricing model, Amazon be damned, and was excited again yesterday when Penguin and HarperCollins joined the party – soon to be followed by the kings at Canongate and Simon and Schuster apparently. One of the coolest things about this is the massive debate that rages on forums around this topic and I spent many a good work hour yesterday reading both sides on The Bookseller and the Kindle Forum.

What strikes me most is the dichotomy between the trade forums and the consumer forums. What sort of relationships do the publishers have with their audience? Will no publisher issue a statement to their public about the reasons they want to take control of prices away from the retailer? So I went on the Kindle Forum and stirred in my two pence, and then a few more things, like sarcasm and blame.

People are championing Amazon as their hero – who “continue to fight against higher prices for e-books” (read: pamper to a customer’s desire to pay as little as possible for as much as possible) – and are ignoring the fact this whole debate was spawned by an effective press release by an international corporation. The blinding holier-than-thou attitude that Amazon has instilled in its customers is nothing short of disgusting and gives me that drunk-on-rage feeling. But then again, you can’t spell ‘Kindle’ without ‘Kind’. (Does this strike anyone else as exceedingly sinister?)

I'm from Amazon

I'll be Kind-le to you - pun definitely intended!

But with publishers staying silent, what are people supposed to think? Innocence doesn’t clam up like a pair of nun’s legs when people start asking questions.

Still, actions are louder than worms etc etc and so I applaud all publishing houses involved for putting a spanner in Amazon’s face. I can’t help but feel this is a major milestone – publishers are now taking the ebook medium seriously and won’t let retailers like Amazon give authors a short straw. It’s already operating in the US, now the UK – Australia’s next, I’d say. Publishers there better make a move before someone else does it for them.


Get involved: head over to the Kindle forum
. It’s an amazing conversation that’s worth getting fired into.

The Author–Editor Relationship

No Gravatar

A good book editor has to be capable of mentoring a person: after hacking at the fundamental structure of an author’s manuscript, an editor needs to be there to field questions, lend support and generally reassure the author their early work has not been one big, protracted period of self delusion and folly.

A good editor is often the only person who will ever consider the text as closely as the author, and therefore is in a good position to play the above mentor role, advising on intimate details of the manuscript’s development while the author rebuilds their manuscript around their shattered ego – this requires considerable, tact, diplomacy and compassion, and often it seems an author becomes willing to let their guard down with their editor more than anyone else, for the sake of their beloved manuscript.

This can be beautiful (though it is sometimes embarrasing and painful), and is the sort of relationship I constantly aspire to in my work. The operative word being ‘aspire’: it is not always possible, especially when an author’s insecurities manifest as petulance, arrogance and resistance.

Garth, I Mean, Ben! Ben Brooks!

No Gravatar

For ages I had this article open in my browser at work because I am loosely interested in keeping in touch with developments in experimental fiction: some days I just want to read a good book, of the ‘lyrical realist’ variety mentioned in the article – the kind of novel we inherited from the nineteenth century; other days I feel bored and want to read something I have to work hard to understand.

I tend to leave these sorts of articles open until I’m feeling relaxed enough to read them over lunch or something, because I know if there’s any sort of revelatory information in there I’m going to need to feel receptive to doing anything with that information, such as, in this case, ordering a book by a writer I’ve never heard of, from a publisher I’ve never heard of in a city I’ve heard a lot about, but never visited.

The book – a novel called Fences, written by eighteen-year-old British schoolboy, Ben Brooks – is published by Fugue State Press in New York, and is not to be confused with the 1990 Garth Brookes album, No Fences.


According to FSP’s minimalist website, their novels

tend to be unusual – singular, eccentric, impractical, emotional, visionary. They are also ‘experimental’ in the sense that any good art is experimental. It comes down to one person looking for truth.

This is the sort of grandiosty that makes me shell out coin at a dubious online checkout and then forget about my purchase until it arrives in the mail, at which point I will fall into one of my new armchairs to douse myself in a … ahem … fugue of literary inspiration. Or frustration, depending on how the book weighs on the ol’ effectiveness scale.

Right now I’m just hoping the difference in time it takes to receive the package from the US varies from now only as fractionally as the difference in the strengths of our dollars, for this US$15 novel cost me a whopping AU$15.15 including postage.

Obviously I’ll review it here sometime after it arrives.

Fulture-cunding, or, I Don’t Play the Oboe

No Gravatar
Hooooonk!

Hooooonk!

I saw the Adelaide Symphony Orchestra play last night – my girlfriend got free tickets and looooooves classical music. I was going to post something silly on Facebook about it before I went: something about how I hoped my fellow grundy fulture-cunding anti-elite didn’t catch me sleeping with the enemy, because I understand that some of the alternative, independent, underground artists and writers I tend to spend a lot of time with get pissy when they find out cultural institutions such as Opera Australia receive millions of dollars more in government funding than any other Australian creative sector.

Instinctively, this upsets me too, because I’ve spent a lot of my otherwise misspent youth pouring my intellectual and creative energies into editing and promoting emerging literature, within a sector that receives relatively bugger all in government funding. But it’s obviously not as cut and dry as that, so it’s a good thing I didn’t post anything stupid – I had the good sense to wait for Lara to get home before I did, and she filled me in that ASO is one of the most poorly funded orchestras in Australia.

I’m still not sure how I feel about that – or about the whole idea that the subsidisation of traditional art forms continues to be prioritised over emerging art forms and, in particular, youth literature.

Then when I dragged myself out of bed this morning, to pour a little more of my unpaid self into making up for that regulation failure, Marcus Westbury had posted a link to this article from the Australian, which seems to conclude that the ASO should stop whingeing about their meagre $75 000 salaries because tickets are already subsidised by 75%. I don’t trust the reporting of those figures, because the Australian generally doesn’t support liberal approaches to cultural funding, but if they’re accurate then I would tend to agree. But then, I don’t play the oboe.

I wasn’t sure of the point Marcus was making, but one commenter got me riled by saying, ‘I think we can all agree classical/orchestral music should have it’s pension cut’. This sort of narrow-minded antagonism tars the rest of us around here who prefer to be respectfully irreverent and critical of traditional culture and how the government funds it. So I got my long winded on and, because I wouldn’t want to waste that on Facebook’s torrential updates feed, here is what I wrote:

I went to the ASO last night and there were two young couples to my left and, on the right, the little old Italian woman who ran the takeaway pizza restaurant next to the video store I worked at as a teenager. The ‘ratcheted up’ industrial action’ was a fifteen minute delay, a sign on the door and red tuxedos replaced by t-shirts reading ‘Great Cities Make Great Orchestras’ (I’m pretty sure that’s what they said – my eyes are beginning to fail).

I’m a ‘young creative’, but I’m also a sentimental bugger, and I was inspired by the performance. I often enjoy watching (or reading, for that matter) the work of the ‘aesthetic traditionalists’, as it helps me see where my creative production fits in our culture. I wouldn’t like to see their ‘pension’ cut, but I’d be happy to see some of that $12.4 million diverted into the literary sector, where there is a similar dearth in resources for promotion and publicity.

What do you reckon? A lot more discussion evolved after I put my bobs in – it’s interesting, if you’re interested in this sort of thing …

The Academy

No Gravatar

Format Logo!

When I came back to Adelaide from Melbourne thinking I could take some time off and bury my head in some books at work, I didn’t expect that a bunch of Adelaide crew would have set up a goddamn arts festival and plonked their headquarters down in a little side street off Hindley, that mungtarded street of strip clubs, sports bars and sleazy meat markets that also happens to house one of the most beautiful bookstores in the state, if not the country, let alone that they would approach me to coordinate the literary stream of said arts festival, but here I am.

It’s called Format Academy of Words, henceforth referred to as ‘the Academy’, because what other academy would you rather join? I don’t know.

An ‘academy’, as if you didn’t already know, is, according to the Macquarie:

noun. (plural – academies)
1. an association or institution for the promotion of literature, science, or art

Format Festival is:

an award winning artist-run festival that celebrates and explores the creative community, showcasing visual, urban and experimental art; as well as zines, live music, craft, activism, performance and discussion.

Their website used to have ‘creative activism’ in there, and was unashamedly inspired by This is Not Art, an ‘independent, emerging and experimental arts festival’, which takes place in sunny Newcastle every year, because, well, we’ve all been inspired by TINA, she’s beaut.

This is all just background noise, to give you an idea of what you might like to get yourself into at the Academy. The theme will be ‘literary activism’, but don’t let that put you off – feel free to replace ‘activism’ with ‘advocacy’, ‘lobbying’ or ‘agency’.

Just as TINA hosts a subsidiary literary festival called National Young Writers’ Festival, Format hosts the Academy, which I have started to think of as

a forum for the discussion of practical ideas about how to guide recent, rapid changes in the publishing industry toward a more democratic, representative, diverse and accessible market for reading, writing  and the dissemination of ideas.

It all sounds a bit grandiose, really. Well, maybe you like that sort of thing. If so, the Academy will happen in late February 2011, at 15 Peel Street in the Adelaide CBD. This is just a heads up for now:

Heads up!

Heads up!

Ironic Questioning

No Gravatar

The use of ironic questioning in clarifying the meaning of an ambiguous phrase or sentence is often counter productive, as the author will usually read your question literally and begin to doubt your intelligence, undermining the authority on which the uptake of your suggestion depends.