Have Atchu!

No Gravatar

Again with the Monty Python, but this clip illustrates the following post as well as it did the post about my flesh wound:

Brian Ward disappeared from Facebook the other day, while we were in the middle of a debate. I was surprised by this, because Brian runs a great-value blog, a lot of which is dedicated to holding other citizen journalists to account. I’m bothering to post about it because I feel like it’s necessary to return the service.

Brian posted a link to an article about the new batch of deadly drugs going around at the moment, accompanied by a comment that people deserved what they got if they took dubious drugs from a dubious dealer. I would post the exact link and comment, but of course I no longer have access to Brian’s Facebook wall.

I said the comment was inordinately harsh, that some people might not be in a position to make a better decision and should not be judged so fiercely for making a bad judgement call. Someone else got involved and the debate quickly swung away from the initial issue to focus on the morality of dealing, something I feel entirely differently about: dealing dubious drugs is morally reprehensible; consuming them is not – and is certainly not deserving of the scorn demonstrated in Brian’s dismissive comment.

It’s exactly this sort of narrow-mindedness that causes problems in drug culture: people who are ignorant of the complexities involved in the decisions surrounding drugs make generalisations that tar the whole community with the wrong brush. Drug users are not all reckless and irresponsible – many use them safely, and I consider it a shame that such users bear the brunt of the stigma that results from those who are irresponsible, and from those who shame them.

Of course, I never got as far as explaining this to Brian. When I came back to the debate and couldn’t access his page, I thought maybe an error had occurred. I added him again, but my advances were rejected. I tried again the next morning. Then and now, when I search for his name he no longer comes up in the results.

At first I thought Brian had a massive dummy spit because I didn’t agree with him1, but as I’ve gone about drafting the post I’ve realised I should give him the benefit of the doubt, as his Facebook page appears to no longer exist. Maybe something really has gone wrong: I’ve emailed him to find out, but have not heard back.

Of course it’s entirely up to Brian whether he allows me to see his Facebook page, and the truth is that we’re not exactly ‘friends’ – we have met once, through a mutual friend. But I had assumed Brian was reading the Facebook definition of ‘friend’ rather loosely – he did, after all, either extend a friendship request to me, or accept one from me, I can’t remember which now.

Maybe I was wrong in assuming that Brian was using Facebook for reasons other than to keep in touch with friends – I have seen him chime in on debates elsewhere, so I thought it would have extended to Facebook. Plus, that he published such a provocative and opinion-laden link suggests that he uses Facebook for debate and information extending beyond his immediate friend circles.

Brian, if something really has gone wrong with Facebook and you’d like to rejoin the debate here, I would certainly welcome that.

-----
  1. from what I’ve read on his blog, he doesn’t take criticism well []
    • Sam
    • December 22nd, 2009

    Not Brian Ward again. That guy is the biggest pest i have ever encountered surfing the world wide web. Actually, I am hesitant to type his name… that guy loves any type of promotion, be it bad or very bad (the two types he generally receives), and he’ll sniff out any mention of him or his site.

    • I hope he sniffs out this, because I’d really like to know what happened and to continue the debate.

  1. My Facebook page is alive and well. I don’t need anything about your opinion on drug use explained to me. I’ve heard what you’ve written above many times before and I think it is hopelessly naive.

    I got bored and unfriended you. Because you repeatedly tried to friend me again I blocked you. Along with the unwanted emails, I call that stalking.

    Time to move on…

    • Esther
    • May 11th, 2010

    Hey :-) I’m interested to know more about your comments on …”the morality of dealing, something I feel entirely differently about: dealing dubious drugs is morally reprehensible; consuming them is not…”

    I can’t help but think its the ‘morally reprehensible’ drug dealers that rely on people buying and consuming their drugs. I believe McDonalds are morally reprehensible so I don’t consume their products, otherwise I would be supporting their conduct and in effect saying its ok. It may be more acceptable to take drugs rather than deal drugs, but doesnt one feed off the other?

    Just my thoughts and no criticism intended at all :-)

    • I’m glad you picked this debate up, because I look at that comment now and realise it’s quite ambiguous. This is well-considered criticism, which I appreciate.

      I guess I meant that consuming them is a mistake, but not an ethical mistake, but that deliberately dealing dubious drugs is certainly an ethical mistake.

      You’re right that buying things from companies whose practices are morally reprehensible renders you complicit in those practices, but this is different from buying drugs from someone you trust.

      Perhaps being involved with drugs at all does contribute to the general culture of dubious dealing, but I’m not sure that cautious, individual, recreational drug use is to blame for the collective culture of reckless, habitual drug use that causes so much pain and damage to people and society.

      Perhaps that’s what Brian was on about, but we’ll probably never know, because he seems to have glazed over in the face of judicious criticism, which is a shame.

  1. No trackbacks yet.